4.7 Article

Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 2-(5-aryl-1H-imidazol-1-yl) derivatives as potential inhibitors of the HIV-1 Vpu and host BST-2 protein interaction

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2020.112111

关键词

TosMIC; 2-(5-aryl-1H-imidazol-1-yl); HIV-1 Vpu; BST-2; ELISA; AlphaScreen assay

资金

  1. National Research Foundation Professional Development Program of South Africa [UID: 78999]
  2. NRF Thuthuka grant [UID: 117794]
  3. South African Medical Research Council [82760]
  4. Mintek
  5. University of the Witwatersrand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel ethyl 2-(5-aryl-1H-imidazol-1-yl)-acetates 17 and propionates 18, together with their acetic acid 19 and acetohydrazide 20 derivatives, were designed and synthesized using TosMIC chemistry. Biological evaluation of these newly synthesized scaffolds in the HIV-1 Vpu- Host BST-2 ELISA assay identified seven hits (17a, 17b, 17c, 17g, 18a, 20f and 20g) with greater than 50% inhibitory activity. These hits were validated in the HIV-1 Vpu- Host BST-2 AlphaScreen (TM) and six of the seven compounds were found to have comparable percentage inhibitory activities to those of the ELISA assay. Compounds 17b and 20g, with consistent percentage inhibitory activities across the two assays, had IC50 values of 11.6 +/- 1.1 mu M and 17.6 +/- 0.9 mu M in a dose response AlphaScreen (TM) assay. In a cell-based HIV-1 antiviral assay, compound 17b exhibited an EC50 = 6.3 +/- 0.7 mu M at non-toxic concentrations (CC50 = 184.5 +/- 0.8 mu M), whereas compound 20g displayed antiviral activity roughly equivalent to its toxicity (CC50 = 159.5 +/- 0.9 mu M). This data suggests that compound 17b, active in both cell-based and biochemical assays, provides a good starting point for the design of possible lead compounds for prevention of HIV-1 Vpu and host BST-2 protein binding in new anti-HIV therapeutics. (C) 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据