4.7 Article

Design, synthesis and 3D-QSAR analysis of novel thiopyranopyrimidine derivatives as potential antitumor agents inhibiting A549 and Hela cancer cells

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.111809

关键词

Thiopyranopyrimidine; EGFR; Inhibitor; 3D-QSAR; CoMFA; CoMSIA

资金

  1. National Natural Science Funds of China [21662014, 81860692]
  2. Jiangxi Outstanding Youth Talent Support Program [20171BCB23078]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi, China [20171ACB21052, 20181BBG70003, 20181ACB20025]
  4. Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University Innovative Research Team [2017CXTD002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four series of thiopyranopyrimidine AZD9291 derivatives containing acrylamide structure were designed, synthesized and evaluated for their antiproliferative activity against A549 and Hela cancer cells. Most of the compounds exhibited excellent antiproliferative activity against A549 cells. Moreover, the compounds with indole ring fluorine substituted exhibited better antiproliferative activity against Hela cells. The most promising compound 23g exhibited excellent enzymatic inhibitory activity and selectivity for EGFR(L858R/T790M) double mutations. The IC50 value against EGFR(L858R/T790M) kinase was 16 nM. The compound 23g inhibits selectively against the mutated form of EGFR, with the selectivity more than 125-fold. Furthermore, compound 23g also inhibited A549 cells, Hela cells and H1975 cells proliferation at a low concentration, and the IC50 values were 0.057 mu M, 0.104 mu M and 0.916 mu M, respectively. To further investigate the QSAR5 of thiopyranopyrimidine derivatives, the CoMFA (q [2] = 0.765, r(2) = 0.965) and CoMSIA (q [2] = 0.875, r(2) = 0.956) models on Hela cancer cells were established. The generated 3D-QSAR model was validated to be reliable and can be used for further design and optimization of novel and selective EGFR inhibitors. (C) 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据