4.3 Article

Comprehensive Identification of Principal Lipid Classes and Tocochromanols in Silkworm (Antheraea pernyi and Bombyx mori) Pupae Oils

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ejlt.201900280

关键词

Antheraea pernyi pupae; Bombyx mori pupae; lipid composition; silkworm pupae oil; tocochromanol

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871737, 31601398]
  2. China Agriculture Research System [CARS-18-ZJ0503]
  3. Innovation Teams ofModern Agricultural Industry Technology System in Guangdong Province [2018LM1087, 2018LM2154]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A comprehensive identification of lipid compositions and tocochromanols in Antheraea pernyi (A. pernyi) and Bombyx mori (B. mori) pupae oil is reported in the present study. Fatty acid profiling shows that both oils contain high levels (79.67% vs 71.11%) of unsaturated fatty acids, especially linoleic acid and linolenic acid. Moreover, linolenic acid is preferentially enriched at the sn-2 positions of triacylglycerols (TAGs). Liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis demonstrates that POO (TAG with one palmitoyl and two oleoyls) is the primary TAG form with percentages of 20.18% in A. pernyi and 15.00% in B. mori. The dominating phospholipid species are phosphatidylcholine (PC, 30.40% vs 54.61%) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE, 34.82% vs 20.39%). Four sterol constituents with total contents of 382.5 +/- 3.12 and 371.65 +/- 2.98 mu g g(-1) are identified and analyzed quantitatively. Additionally, the levels of tocochromanols (20.15 +/- 0.89 vs 17.15 +/- 0.71 mg g(-1)) are quantified in both silkworm pupae oils. Overall, silkworm oil acts as an enriched source of functional lipids and tocochromanols. Practical Applications: A systematic investigation on the principal lipid classes and tocochromanols of Antheraea pernyi pupae and Bombyx mori pupae oil is reported in this study. The informative data provide supporting evidence for comprehensive utilization of silkworm oil for production of nutritional and healthy products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据