4.2 Article

Enrichment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a contaminated soil after rehabilitation

期刊

BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 47, 期 4, 页码 853-862

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.06.001

关键词

Glomeromycota; Heavy metals; Soil contamination; Mycorrhiza; Revegetation

资金

  1. Coordination of Higher Education Personnel Training (Capes)
  2. Support Foundation to Research of Minas Gerais (Fapemig)
  3. National Council of Scientific and Technologic Development (CNPq)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spore counts, species composition and richness of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, and soil glomalin contents were evaluated in a soil contaminated with Zn, Cu, Cd and Pb after rehabilitation by partial replacement of the contaminated soil with non-contaminated soil, and by Eucalyptus camaldulensis planting with and without Brachiaria decumbens sowing. These rehabilitation procedures were compared with soils from contaminated non-rehabilitated area and non-contaminated adjacent soils. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi communities attributes were assessed by direct field sampling, trap culture technique, and by glomalin contents estimate. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi was markedly favored by rehabilitation, and a total of 15 arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi morphotypes were detected in the studied area. Species from the Glomus and Acaulospora genera were the most common mycorrhizal fungi. Number of spores was increased by as much as 300-fold, and species richness almost doubled in areas rehabilitated by planting Eucalyptus in rows and sowing B. decumbens in inter-rows. Contents of heavy metals in the soil were negatively correlated with both species richness and glomalin contents. Introduction of B. decumbens together with Eucalyptus causes enrichment of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi species and a more balanced community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi spores in contaminated soil. (C) 2016 Sociedade Brasileira de Microbiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据