4.4 Article

Pre-operative transnasal endoscopy as a predictor of difficult airway A prospective cohort study

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 2, 页码 98-104

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001127

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Anaesthesiology, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan
  2. Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND Consequences of failed endotracheal intubation can be catastrophic and predicting difficulty is therefore a critical issue. There is no consensus on the best way to predict difficulty. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of transnasal flexible endoscopic laryngoscopy (TFEL), a minimally invasive procedure, in the prediction of difficult intubation. DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SETTING San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, a tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS One hundred and sixty nine adults scheduled for elective ear, nose and throat surgery under general anaesthesia with pre-operative TFEL. INTERVENTION In addition to routine pre-operative evaluation by an anaesthesiologist, glottis exposure during TFEL was assessed with a scoring system similar to the modified Cormack-Lehane (MCL). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The extent to which TFEL improves the prediction of difficult direct laryngoscopy, measured with the MCL score, and of difficult intubation, measured with the intubation difficulty scale score. RESULTS When added to bedside evaluation, TFEL performed during tongue protrusion significantly (P = 0.005) improved the prediction of MCL. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67 to 0.83] vs. 0.65 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.74). For the intubation difficulty scale (P = 0.049), the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.70 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.80) vs. 0.66 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.74). CONCLUSION TFEL is a useful tool in predicting difficult intubation, improving predictability of routine bedside evaluation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据