4.8 Article

Neutral red-mediated microbial electrosynthesis by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Zymomonas mobilis

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 57-65

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.005

关键词

Neutral red; Electron transfer; Bioelectrochemical system; Electrosynthesis

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) - USA Career Award [0954186]
  2. NIH Training Grant [5T32GM008336-24]
  3. National Science Foundation MRI Program Grant [DBI-1229749]
  4. Fundamental and Applied Chemical and Biological Catalysts to Minimize Climate Change, Create a Sustainable Energy Future, and Provide a Safer Food Supply [WNP00807]
  5. Directorate For Engineering
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0954186] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Biological Infrastructure
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences [1229749] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work was to compare the effects of electrosynthesis on different bacterial species. The effects of neutral red-mediated electrosynthesis on the metabolite profiles of three microorganisms: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Zymomonas mobilis, were measured and compared and contrasted. A statistically comprehensive analysis of neutral red-mediated electrosynthesis is presented using the analysis of end-product profiles, current delivered, and changes in cellular protein expression. K. pneumoniae displayed the most dramatic response to electrosynthesis of the three bacteria, producing 93% more ethanol and 76% more lactate vs. control fermentation with no neutral red and no electron delivery. Z. mobilis showed no response to electrosynthesis except elevated acetate titers. Stoichiometric comparison showed that NAD(+) reduction by neutral red could not account for changes in metabolites during electrosynthesis. Neutral red-mediated electrosynthesis was shown to have multifarious effects on the three species. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据