4.7 Article

Integrated assessment of the environmental and economic effects of coal-to-gas conversion project in rural areas of northern China

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
卷 27, 期 13, 页码 14503-14514

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08004-y

关键词

Bulk coal; Natural gas; Domestic heating; Life cycle assessment; Life cycle cost

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [71974116]
  2. National Key RD Plan [2019YFC190208]
  3. Shandong Natural Science Foundation [ZR2019MEE104, ZR2019MG009]
  4. Fundamental Research Fund of Shandong University [2018JC049, 2018GN046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Northern China suffers from serious air pollution especially in winter, much of which derives from solid fuel used for domestic heating in rural areas. In order to reduce pollution emissions in the heating season, the Chinese government has introduced a coal-to-gas conversion policy, promoting a switch to natural gas which is much cleaner than the coal normally used for winter heating. The coal-to-gas conversion project will cover more than 1.8 billion m(2) of heated built floor area and affect more than 12 million heat users in Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, and the surrounding areas. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methods are applied to compare and analyze the environmental impact and economic cost of household energy usage for the whole year under 5 scenarios before and after coal-to-gas conversion. In the three scenarios after coal-to-gas conversion, the environmental impact decreases by around 50% while the total economic cost increases by around 80%. Particulate emissions responsible for air pollution are considerably reduced with accompanying benefits for human health, though significant, but reduced, impacts on freshwater and marine ecotoxicity remain. Improving thermal efficiency through natural gas utilization, implementing an energy-saving retrofit of rural housing, and promoting straw utilization yield benefits for people and the environment in rural areas of northern China.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据