4.8 Article

Improving Carbon Stock Estimates for In-Use Harvested Wood Products by Linking Production and Consumption-A Global Case Study

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 2565-2574

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05721

关键词

-

资金

  1. Key Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China [14AJY014]
  2. Jiangsu Province 333 Distinguished Talents Project Research Foundation
  3. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX17_0824]
  4. Doctorate Fellowship Foundation of Nanjing Forestry University [163060108]
  5. FCT Foundation for Science and Technology (Portugal) [CEECIND/02174/2017]
  6. CESAM [UID/AMB/50017/2019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed a method to better estimate the carbon stocks of in-use harvested wood products (HWP) by using the Eora multiregional input-output tables to link global HWP production and end uses, compared to existing global-scale studies that focused on semifinished HWP. Using the new method, we allocated global HWP to country-specific end uses, including solid HWP used in (1) construction, (2) furniture production, and (3) other end uses, and as (4) household and sanitary paper and (5) other paper and paper products, while the HWP carbon stocks in these end uses were estimated using the Stock Change Approach. We reported that HWP produced globally contained an annual average of 277.7 teragram carbon in 1992-2015, of which 63.0, 12.6, 76.7, 9.1, and 116.3 teragram carbon were consumed by the above five end uses, respectively. By 2015, the carbon stocks of global in-use HWP produced since 1992 accumulated to 2938 teragrams of carbon, of which the above five HWP end uses accounted for 1489, 268, 890, 0, and 291 teragrams of carbon, respectively. Country-specific HWP production and consumption varied significantly, with the eight leading consuming countries (United States, China, Japan, Canada, Germany, Russia, United Kingdom, and France) accounting for 69% of the global in-use HWP carbon stocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据