4.8 Article

Bioelectrochemical Ammoniation Coupled with Microbial Electrolysis for Nitrogen Recovery from Nitrate in Wastewater

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 5, 页码 3002-3011

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05290

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51922051, 21876090]
  2. Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology [18JCZDJC39400]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. 111 program, Ministry of Education, China [T2017002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrate-N in wastewaters is hard to be recovered because it is difficult to volatilize with an opposite charge to ammonium. Here, we have proved the feasibility of dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia (DNRA) by the easy-acclimated mixed electroactive bacteria, achieving the highest DNRA efficiency of 44%. It was then coupled with microbial electrolysis to concentrate ammonium by a factor of 4 in the catholyte for recovery. The abundance of electroactive bacteria in the biofilm before nitrate addition, especially Geobacter spp., was found to determine the DNRA efficiency. As the main competitors of DNRA bacteria, the growth of denitrifiers was more sensitive to C/N ratios. The DNRA microbial community contrarily showed a stable and recoverable ammoniation performance over C/N ratios ranging from 0.5 to 8.0. A strong competition of the electrode and nitrate on electron donors was observed at the early stage (15 d) of electroactive biofilm formation, which can be weakened when the biofilm was mature on 40 d. Quantitative PCR showed a significant increase in nirS and nrfA transcripts in the ammoniation process. nirS was inhibited significantly after nitrate depletion while nrfA was still upregulated. These findings provided a novel way to recover nitrate-N using organic wastes as both electron donor and power, which has broader implications on the sustainable wastewater treatment and the ecology of nitrogen cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据