4.8 Article

In Situ-Formed PdFe Nanoalloy and Carbon Defects in Cathode for Synergic Reduction-Oxidation of Chlorinated Pollutants in Electro-Fenton Process

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 7, 页码 4564-4572

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05896

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation P.R. China [21677106, 21537003]
  2. Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [14DZ2261100]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complete dechlorination and mineralization of chlorophenols via the reduction-oxidation-mediated electro-Fenton process with a composite bulk cathode is first proposed. The in situ formation of a PdFe nanoalloy and carbon defects as key active sites is mutually induced during the formation of a carbon aerogel-based electrode. Specifically, the PdFe nanoalloy promotes the generation of [H](ads) as reduction sites and improves the electron transfer via an electrical circuit, while the carbon defects selectively favor the 2e(-) oxygen reduction pathway. Notably, this work implies a novel electrocatalytic model for the formation of center dot OH via (2 + 1)e(-) oxygen reduction by a consecutive reaction with carbon defects and a PdFe nanoalloy. Complete total organic carbon removal and dechlorination of 3-chlorophenol were performed after 6 h. The kinetic rate constant for removing haloacetamides (HAMs) in drinking water was 0.21-0.41 h(-1), and the degradation efficiency was self-enhanced after electrolysis for 2 h because of the increased concentration of [H+]. The specific energy consumption was similar to 0.55 W.h.g(-1) at 100% removal of some HAMs, corresponding to a power consumption of 0.6-1.1 kW.h for complete dehalogenation per ton of drinking water in waterworks. Moreover, the PdFe alloy/CA exhibited extreme mechanical and electrochemical stability with limited iron (similar to 0.07 ppm) and palladium (0.02 ppm) leaching during the actual application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据