4.8 Article

Increased Resistance of Nitrite-Admixed Concrete to Microbially Induced Corrosion in Real Sewers

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 4, 页码 2323-2333

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b06680

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Gold Coast Water and Waste, District of Columbia Water and Sewer Authority, and South East Water [LP150101337]
  3. Australian Research Council DECRA Fellowship [DE170100694]
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbially induced concrete corrosion is a major deterioration process in sewers, causing a huge economic burden, and improved mitigating technologies are required. This study reports a novel and promising effective solution to attenuate the corrosion in sewers using calcium nitrite-admixed concrete. This strategy aims to suppress the development and activity of corrosion-inducing microorganisms with the antimicrobial free nitrous acid, which is generated in situ from calcium nitrite that is added to the concrete. Concrete coupons with calcium nitrite as an admixture were exposed in a sewer manhole, together with control coupons that had no nitrite admixture, for 18 months. The corrosion process was monitored by measuring the surface pH, corrosion product composition, concrete corrosion loss, and the microbial community on the corrosion layer. During the exposure, the corrosion loss of the admixed concrete coupons was 30% lower than that of the control coupons. The sulfide uptake rate of the admixed concrete was also 30% lower, leading to a higher surface pH (0.5-0.6 unit), in comparison to that of the control coupons. A negative correlation between the calcium nitrite admixture in concrete and the abundance of sulfide oxidizing microorganisms was determined by DNA sequencing. The results obtained in this field study demonstrated that this novel use of calcium nitrite as an admixture in concrete is a promising strategy to mitigate the microbially induced corrosion in sewers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据