4.8 Article

Molecular and Functional Properties of the Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua) Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptors Ahr1a and Ahr2a

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 1033-1044

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05312

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bergen Marine Research Cluster for the Ocean Outlook fellowship
  2. Research Council of Norway [244564, 248840]
  3. U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (Superfund Research Program at Boston University) at WHOI [P42ES007381]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (Ahr) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that mediates the toxicity of halogenated and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in vertebrates. Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) has recently emerged as a model organism in environmental toxicology studies, and increased knowledge of Ahr-mediated responses to xenobiotics is imperative. Genome mining and phylogenetic analyses revealed two Ahr-encoding genes in the Atlantic cod genome, gmahr1a and gmahr2a. In vitro binding assays showed that both gmAhr proteins bind to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), but stronger binding to gmAhr1a was observed. Transactivation studies with a reporter gene assay revealed that gmAhr1a is one order of magnitude more sensitive to TCDD than gmAhr2a, but the maximal responses of the receptors were similar. Other well-known Ahr agonists, such as beta-naphthoflavone (BNF), 3,3',4,4',5-pentachlorobiphenyl (PCB126), and 6-formylindolo[3,2-b]carbazole (FICZ), also activated the gmAhr proteins, but gmAhr1a was, in general, the more sensitive receptor and produced the highest efficacies. The induction of cyp1a in exposed precision-cut cod liver slices confirmed the activation of the Ahr signaling pathway ex vivo. In conclusion, the differences in transcriptional activation by gmAhr's with various agonists, the distinct binding properties with TCDD and BNF, and the distinct tissue-specific expression profiles indicate different functional specializations of the Atlantic cod Ahr's.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据