4.7 Article

Summer heat extremes in northern continents linked to developing ENSO events

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 15, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7d07

关键词

summer heat extremes; El Nino-Southern Oscillation; interannual variability; circumglobal teleconnection; jet stream

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41871029, 41401052]
  2. Pearl River Talent Recruitment Program of Guangdong Province, China [2017GC010634]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the variations of extreme weather/climate events is important to improve the seasonal forecast skill of such harmful events. Previous studies have linked boreal summer hot extremes to decaying El Nino-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events at the interannual scale, but how these hot extreme episodes respond to developing ENSO events remains unclear. Using observational analyses, we demonstrate strong linkages between developing ENSO and extreme heat events in northern continents. In particular, heat extremes in North America, Eastern Europe-Central Asia and Northeast Asia tend to be more frequent during La Nina developing summers and less frequent during El Nino developing phases. Associated atmospheric changes reveal that developing ENSO events feature a circumglobal teleconnection (CGT) pattern over the mid-latitudes. In the La Nina developing summer, this CGT pattern exhibits enhanced geopotential height and anomalous anticyclones over North Pacific, North America, Eastern Europe-Central Asia and Northeastern Asia, and the jet stream generally shifts northward. The atmospheric circulation changes lead to more persistent weather conditions that favor extreme heat events in mid-latitudes. Conversely, opposite changes associated with developing El Nino can inhibit heat extremes in the above locations. The responses of heat extremes to different types (i.e., conventional Eastern Pacific and Modoki Central Pacific) and durations (1 and 2 year) of ENSO events are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据