4.7 Editorial Material

Focus on leakage and spillovers: informing land-use governance in a tele-coupled world

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab7397

关键词

-

资金

  1. Robert Bosch Foundation through the research project STRIVE [031 B0019]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research through the research project STRIVE [031 B0019]
  3. Stockholm Environment Institute
  4. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [677140 MIDLAND]
  5. Formas within the LEAKAGE project [2016-00351]
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation [GFP1161976 BRA]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Governing land use to achieve sustainable outcomes is challenging, because land systems manifest complex land use spillovers-i.e. processes by which land use changes or direct interventions in land use (e.g. policy, program, new technologies) in one place have impacts on land use in another place. The ERL issue 'Focus on Leakage: informing Land-Use Governance in a Tele-coupled World' builds on discussions in an international expert workshop conducted in Berlin in November 2017 to explore innovative ways to improve our understanding of how governance interventions, new technologies and other factors can affect land-use change both directly and indirectly through spillovers. This editorial starts by clarifying the definitions and relationships betweenland-use spillover,indirect land use change-a form of spillover where land use change in one place is caused by land use change in another place-leakage-a form of land use spillover, which is caused by an environmental policy (e.g. a conservation or restoration intervention), and the spillover reduces the overall benefits and effectiveness of this intervention-, and land usedisplacementprocesses. We then use this terminology to summarize the individual contributions of this special issue and conclude with lessons learned as well as directions for future research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据