4.7 Article

Effects of biochar nanoparticles on seed germination and seedling growth

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 256, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113409

关键词

Biochar; Nanoparticle; Seedling growth; Phenolic compounds; Blocking effect; Environmental risk

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21621005, 21537005]
  2. National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1800705]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a soil amendment, the prospect of biochar application is excellent. However, environmental risks of biochar need to be investigated for its substantial use. The environmental risks of BNPs need urgent attention because at present little knowledge is available. Therefore, the effects of six types of BNPs on seed germination and growth of rice, tomato and reed seedlings were investigated. The BNPs were collected from biochars derived from two feedstocks (rice straw and wood sawdust) under 300 degrees C (low-temperature), 500 degrees C (mid-temperature) and 700 degrees C (high-temperature). The BNPs collected from high-temperature biochar inhibited seed germination of rice. However, all of the BNPs had a stimulating effect on rice seedling growth that significantly increasing the length of its root and shoot. Furthermore, the BNPs collected from high-temperature biochar and lignin-rich feedstock had an inhibiting effect on reed that dramatically decreased shoot length and biomass. Inhibitory effects of BNPs were caused not only by phenolic compounds on its surface, but also by the blocking effect on epidermal openings resulting in a reduced transfer of nutrients and water. No evidence was found that BNPs would affect the seed gemination and seedling growth of tomato plants. This study indicates that the eco-toxicity of BNPs is a potential environmental risk of biochar. Our findings provide new evidence for the necessity of establishing environmental risk management of biochar. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据