4.7 Article

Magnetic aluminum-based metal organic framework as a novel magnetic adsorbent for the effective removal of minocycline from aqueous solutions

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
卷 255, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113226

关键词

Metal organic framework; Minocycline; Adsorption; Magnetic separation; Mechanism

资金

  1. social science and technology development project of Dongguan [20185071631595]
  2. NSF of China [21976060]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, Fe3O4@MIL-68 (Al), a magnetic aluminum-based metal organic framework, was synthesized by a simple method and used as a novel and effective adsorbent for the removal of minocycline (MC) from aqueous solutions. The material was thoroughly characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and N-2 adsorption isotherms. The characterization results showed that the original structure of MIL-68(Al) was unchanged by the addition of Fe3O4 nanoparticles, and that the obtained material had a strong magnetic response which also promoted its adsorption. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted by the varying the adsorption time, temperature, initial MC concentration and pH. The maximum adsorption amount of MC onto Fe3O4@ MIL-68 (Al) was 248.05 mg g(-1), (t = 160 min, pH = 6, C-0 = 60 mg L-1), and the adsorption kinetics followed a pseudo-second-order model, and the adsorption isotherms conformed to the Freundlich equation. The adsorption mechanism of the magnetic metal organic framework materials were determined to involve complex interactions, including Al-N and Fe-N covalent bonds, hydrogen bonding, electrostatic adsorption, and pi-pi stacking. Combined the results indicate that Fe3O4@MIL-68 (Al) is an outstanding adsorbent for the removal of MC from water. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据