4.6 Article

Entropy-Based Image Fusion with Joint Sparse Representation and Rolling Guidance Filter

期刊

ENTROPY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/e22010118

关键词

image entropy; joint bilateral filter; image fusion; rolling guidance filter; joint sparse representation; multi-scale decomposition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61701327, 61711540303]
  2. Science Foundation of Sichuan Science and Technology Department [2018GZ0178]
  3. Open research fund of State Key Laboratory [614250304010517]
  4. Applied Basic Research Programs of Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2019YJ0110]
  5. Science and Technology Service Industry Demonstration Programs of Sichuan Province [2019GFW167]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Image fusion is a very practical technology that can be applied in many fields, such as medicine, remote sensing and surveillance. An image fusion method using multi-scale decomposition and joint sparse representation is introduced in this paper. First, joint sparse representation is applied to decompose two source images into a common image and two innovation images. Second, two initial weight maps are generated by filtering the two source images separately. Final weight maps are obtained by joint bilateral filtering according to the initial weight maps. Then, the multi-scale decomposition of the innovation images is performed through the rolling guide filter. Finally, the final weight maps are used to generate the fused innovation image. The fused innovation image and the common image are combined to generate the ultimate fused image. The experimental results show that our method's average metrics are: mutual information (MI)-5.3377, feature mutual information (FMI)-0.5600, normalized weighted edge preservation value (QAB/F)-0.6978 and nonlinear correlation information entropy (NCIE)-0.8226. Our method can achieve better performance compared to the state-of-the-art methods in visual perception and objective quantification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据