4.7 Article

Combustion and emission characteristics of RCEM and common rail diesel engine working with diesel fuel and ethanol/hydrous ethanol injected in the intake and exhaust port: Assessment and comparison

期刊

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112453

关键词

Ethanol and hydrous ethanol; Intake and exhaust injection modes; Rapid compression-expansion machine; Flame images, combustion and emission characteristics; Common rail diesel engine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, experiments are performed to evaluate and compare the combustion and emission characteristics of a rapid compression-expansion machine (RCEM) and a common rail diesel engine run with diesel fuel and ethanol/hydrous ethanol injection individually in the exhaust and intake manifold. The RCEM is run under diesel engine conditions with two different temperatures, which are 120 degrees C and 180 degrees C to simulate the intake and exhaust state. The flame ionization detector (FID) and gas chromatography (GC) are used to estimate the amount of ethanol introduced in the engine cylinder. The results for RCEM display that the ignition delay significantly diminishes by about 50% with enlarging the mixture temperature of ethanol while the NOx and soot formation enlarge. Regarding the diesel engine results, the proportion of ethanol introduced in the engine cylinder is approximately 80%, 43%, and 47% at ethanol injection duration of 2620 mu s, 3488 mu s, and 4497 mu s, respectively. The peak cylinder pressure, heat release rate, and flame temperature are reduced for pure ethanol injection exhaust mode compared to the intake approach. Moreover, the ignition delay increases as the water content in the aqueous ethanol solution increased. From the combustion and exhaust emission results, it can be deduced that the exhaust mode is recommended, particularly at the low concentration of ethanol in the mixtures, which could be exploited in the commercial combustion applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据