4.7 Article

Field study and numerical investigation on heating performance of air carrying energy radiant air-conditioning system in an office

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109712

关键词

Composite air carrying energy; Radiant system; CFD simulation; Temperature distribution

资金

  1. Hunan Provincial Innovation Foundation for Postgraduate Studies [CX20190287]
  2. National Key Technology Support Program [2015BAJ03B01]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201906130075]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A ceiling-sidewall composite air carrying energy radiant air-conditioning system (ACERS) is presented, and the heating performance of the ceiling-sidewall composite ACERS combined with air source heat pump is investigated by field experiment. The results show that the combined system can meet the heating requirement for office buildings in south-central China, and also have the energy-saving potential. Moreover, the indoor thermal environment under three different installation types, namely the ceiling, the sidewall, and the ceiling-sidewall composite type, is analyzed by using computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation. The comparisons of three types indicate that all of them can meet the temperature requirement, but the temperature is more uniform and higher in the composite ACERS. Meanwhile, the temperature gradient in the ceiling ACERS is smaller than that of the sidewall ACERS due to the further heat transfer caused by air penetration. Both the experimental and CFD simulated temperature distribution demonstrates that the shelter of furniture has an impact on the indoor thermal environment, and it should not be ignored in practical engineering. This research shows the feasibility of winter heating by using the ACERS in office buildings, and is helpful for HVAC engineers to design and apply different ACERS types and realize the integration of air conditioning in winter and summer in this area. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据