4.7 Article

Low carbon building performance in the construction industry: A multi-method approach of project management operations and building energy use applied in a UK public office building

期刊

ENERGY AND BUILDINGS
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109609

关键词

Energy consumption; Simulation; Low carbon; Building performance; System dynamics

资金

  1. 'The 'Total Performance' of Low Carbon Buildings in China and the UK' ('TOP') project - UK EPSRC [EP/N009703/1]
  2. NSFC China [51561135001]
  3. EPSRC [EP/N009703/1, EP/P022405/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance gap in the United Kingdom construction industry is a persistent problem as new building development projects underperform more often than not. The performance gap is partially attributed to the number of stages involved in building project development and the coordination difficulties of partners with different incentives. The project outcome is important for energy consumption, carbon emissions and occupant well-being. Thus, it is important to study the project management process in terms of the standard time, cost and quality parameters, but also in terms of project partner incentives and coordination, and the subsequent energy performance and resultant indoor environmental conditions. A system dynamics model of project management processes is developed to explore the implications of partner coordination for building quality. The system dynamics model is coupled to a building performance simulation model to explore building energy consumption and Indoor Environmental Quality, and apply this on a recent building project case study. Results show that greater project partner alignment can reduce annual energy consumption up to 12% and CO2 emissions up to 37%, with greater emphasis in the design stage of the project subject to resource availability. The trade-offs involved on value appropriation are considered and discussion of results points to possible ways for improvement. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据