4.7 Article

Pyrolysis Kinetics, Thermodynamics, and Volatiles of Representative Pine Wood with Thermogravimetry-Fourier Transform Infrared Analysis

期刊

ENERGY & FUELS
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 1859-1869

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03872

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806106]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Jiangsu Province, China [BK20170838]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To provide guidance for converting pine wood into fuel or chemical raw material by pyrolysis, the kinetics, thermodynamics, and volatiles of pine wood (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) are studied using thermogravimetry and Fourier transform infrared analysis with heating rates from 5 to 40 K/min. The model-free method combined with the model-fitting method is used to estimate the kinetic triplets and thermodynamic parameters. The pine wood pyrolysis in the conversion rate range of 0 <= alpha <= 0.9 may be regarded as a single-step reaction. The average values of the activation energy and pre-exponential factor are 181.20 kJ/mol and 6.84 x 10(11) s(-1) , respectively. The reaction model and mechanism for pine wood pyrolysis in the range of 0 <= alpha <= 0.9 may be g(alpha) = [1 - (1 - alpha)(1/3)](2) and diffusion, respectively. Based upon the estimated kinetic triplets, the simulated curves of the conversion rate alpha and reaction rate d alpha/dT are in good agreement with the experimental curves at multiple heating rates. All values of Delta H and Delta G maintain at a positive constant, whereas all values of Delta S are negative. In addition, the volatiles are mainly generated in the range of 0 <= alpha <= 0.9, and the evolution of volatiles is consistent with that of the reaction rate curves. The concentration of the major volatiles in the sequence from highest to lowest is formaldehyde methanol methane CO2 > CO. Moreover, the concentration of formaldehyde is nearly twice that of methanol and 3 times that of methane.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据