4.7 Article

Multi-objective optimization and selection of hybrid combined cooling, heating and power systems considering operational flexibility

期刊

ENERGY
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117313

关键词

multi-objective optimization; Combined cooling heating and power (CCHP) system; Multi-criteria decision making; Operational flexibility; Hybrid power plant

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876064]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality [3202027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a multi-objective optimization model integrated with operational flexibility to optimize a hybrid combined cooling, heating and power (CCHP) system. The operational flexibility of the hybrid CCHP system is proposed and expressed by the combined indicators to show the capacity to resist performance degradation because of externally variable conditions to increase energy saving and cost saving, to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, and to enhance renewability, the ability to adjust heat and electricity, and the grid integration level. A Pareto frontier of solutions considering a larger operational flexibility with less performance degradation is obtained in genetic algorithm. The use of a multi-criteria decision making method combined with an entropy weighting method is employed to quantitatively evaluate the composite sustainability index of the Pareto schemes and choose the optimal hybrid CCHP option with the best integrated performance. The results of a case study that considers operational flexibility and optimization indicated that the potential adjustable ability was increased by 438.9%, and the grid integration level and net interaction with the grid were decreased by 3.6%. However, the increase in flexibility reduces the energetic, economic and environmental benefits achieved by the CCHP system by 5.1%, 56.4% and 3.0%, respectively. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据