4.7 Article

Investigation on the effect of bluff body ball on the combustion characteristics for methane/oxygen in micro combustor

期刊

ENERGY
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116465

关键词

Micro combustion; Inserted bluff body ball; Visualization experiment; Flammability limits; Combustion efficiency

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [91641113, 51576093]
  2. Natural Science grant of Jiangsu province [BK20180872]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [KYCX17_1775]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A micro combustor inserted with a bluff body ball was developed and compared with the conventional combustor. The combustion characteristics (flammability limits, stable flame propagation and combustion efficiency) of methane/oxygen mixture in the micro combustor with bluff body ball were experimentally and numerically investigated. The results show that bluff body ball could broaden flammability limits of methane/oxygen mixture in the combustor. When inlet velocity was 0.7 m/s, the flammability limits in the combustor with 1 mm bluff body ball had equivalence ratios of 1.2 and 2.05 and that in the combustor with 2 mm bluff body ball had equivalence ratios of 1.5 and 2.68, which are larger than that in conventional combustors. The bluff body ball beneficially decreased the propagation velocity of the stable flame thereby making the gases burn completely. When the inlet velocity was 0.5 m/s, the combustion efficiency of the combustor inserted with a bluff body ball was 82.899% which was 2.7% higher than that of conventional combustor. However, the difference in combustion efficiency between the combustor with and without a bluff body ball decreases as the inlet velocity increases. When the velocity increased to 1.25 m/s, the difference was 0.75%. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据