4.7 Article

Three-dimensional numerical investigation of a hybrid low concentrated photovoltaic/thermal system

期刊

ENERGY
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116436

关键词

Photovoltaic/thermal system; FV-DO radiation method; Energy and exergy analysis; Heat sink

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876062, 51821004]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2018JQ02]
  3. International Clean Energy Talent Program by China Scholarship Council [201904100046]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concentrated photovoltaic/thermal hybrid collectors have received ever-increasing attention due to the simultaneous output of electric and thermal energy. For further improvement of concentrated hybrid PV/T systems, a simulation method combining the multiphysics fields is necessary to accurately analyze the optical, thermal, and electric performance. Herein, a three-dimensional numerical study has been conducted on a low concentrated photovoltaic/thermal system utilizing a heat transfer fluid as the cooling medium and a compound parabolic concentrator as the mirror field. A finite volume (FV)-CFD code has been employed to simulate the entire model, where the optical modelling is validated theoretically with the Monte Carlo ray-tracing method. The influences of employing various heatsink designs (U-type and Z-type) and coolants (water, ethylene glycol, and therminol VP-1) are numerically investigated. The economic feasibility of the hybrid PV/T system is also assessed in comparison with the standalone PV-cell. Good compatibility with the empirical data was obtained when the appropriate modelling tunings were applied. It is also shown that, on a typical day, the total energy and exergy efficiencies of the system are up to 57.66% and 7.94%, respectively. The Z-type heatsink decreases the average PV-cell temperature than the U-type design, and also the output power is slightly enhanced. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据