4.5 Article

Contribution of amygdala to the pressor response elicited by microinjection of angiotensin II into the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 202-207

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2016.10.001

关键词

Angiotensin II; Bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; Amygdala; Single unit response; Blood pressure

资金

  1. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST) is part of the limbic system located in the rostral forebrain. BST is involved in behavioral, neuroendocrine and autonomic functions, including cardiovascular regulation. The amygdala, plays an important role in mediating the behavioral and physiological responses associated with fear and anxiety, including cardiovascular responses. In a previous study, we showed that microinjection of AngII into the BST produced a pressor and two types of single-unit responses in the BST, short excitatory and long inhibitory. This study was performed to find possible involvement of amygdala in cardiovascular responses elicited by microinjection of AngII into the BST, using blockade of the central nucleus of amygdala (CeA) and single unit recording from the CeA, while injecting AngII into the BST in anesthetized rat. Blockade of CeA attenuated the pressor response to microinjection of AngII into the BST. Eighty-six Angll microinjections were given into the BST and 198 single unit responses were recorded from CeA simultaneously, from which 89 showed a short duration excitatory response and 109 showed no responses. In conclusion, microinjection of AngII into the BST produces a short excitatory single unit response in the CeA, resulting in contribution of amygdala to the resulted pressor response. Taken together, our study and previous studies suggest a plausible hypothesis that these two nuclei perform their cardiovascular functions in cooperation with each other. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据