4.8 Article

Metabolic switch and epithelial-mesenchymal transition cooperate to regulate pluripotency

期刊

EMBO JOURNAL
卷 39, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019102961

关键词

mesenchymal-epithelial transition; metabolic switch; pluripotent state; reprogramming

资金

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA16010305]
  2. Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of Chinese Academy of Sciences [QYZDB-SSW-SMC031]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1601228, 31671475, 31421004, 31900699, 81702445]
  4. Key and Development Program of Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory [2018GZR110104008]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2017B030314056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Both metabolic switch from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis (OGS) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) promote cellular reprogramming at early stages. However, their connections have not been elucidated. Here, when a chemically defined medium was used to induce early EMT during mouse reprogramming, a facilitated OGS was also observed at the same time. Additional investigations suggested that the two events formed a positive feedback loop via transcriptional activation, cooperated to upregulate epigenetic factors such as Bmi1, Ctcf, Ezh2, Kdm2b, and Wdr5, and accelerated pluripotency induction at the early stage. However, at late stages, by over-inducing glycolysis and preventing the necessary mesenchymal-epithelial transition, the two events trapped the cells at a new pluripotency state between naive and primed states and inhibited further reprogramming toward the naive state. In addition, the pluripotent stem cells at the new state have high similarity to epiblasts from E4.5 and E5.5 embryos, and have distinct characteristics from the previously reported epiblast-like or formative states. Therefore, the time-dependent cooperation between OGS and EMT in regulating pluripotency should extend our understanding of related fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据