4.6 Article

Electrochromic and colorimetric properties of anodic NiO thin films: Uncovering electrochromic mechanism of NiO

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 335, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135648

关键词

Electrochromic; Electrochromism; Tungsten oxide; Nickel oxide; Coloration mechanism; Colorimetry

资金

  1. National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada [2017-05094]
  2. John R. Evans Leaders Fund (Canada Foundation for Innovation) [27741]
  3. Research Assistantships Initiative of New Brunswick Innovation Fund (NBIF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work anodic NiO electrochromism is investigated under two potential cycling modes: i) the response between coloration and bleaching in increasing potential steps (switching); ii) the stepwise modulation to coloration with increasing potential and back to bleaching (modulation). The films' response is investigated by optical spectroscopy, colorimetry studies, Raman spectroscopy, XRD, cyclic voltammetry and chronoamperometry. Using the CIE (Commisson International de l'Eclairage) system of colorimetry the color stimuli of the films and the changes that take place upon reversible switching/modulation are recorded under various potentials. As shown by the CIE 1931 xy chromaticity coordinates, when NiO film is oxidized, a sharp decrease in luminance is observed. Optical measurements, performed as a function of applied potential, show excellent contrast between colored and bleached states. Up to now, for NiO, the coloration mechanism was considered as a surface phenomenon. Here, for the first time we show that upon ion insertion/extraction the lattice constant of NiO changes, proving that the EC coloration mechanism involves the unit cells in the bulk material. Furthermore, the fraction ratio of Li to Ni atoms (Li/Ni) is proposed. Considering the actual film fabrication conditions, the x value in LixNiO is found to be equal to 0.0046. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据