4.6 Article

Synthesis of nitrogen-doped oxygen-deficient TiO2-x/reduced graphene oxide/sulfur microspheres via spray drying process for lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 326, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134968

关键词

Lithium-sulfur batteries; Oxygen-deficient TiO2; Nitrogen doped TiO2; Reduced graphene oxide

资金

  1. Program for the Outstanding Young Talents of Hebei Province, China
  2. Chunhui Project of Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [Z2017010]
  3. Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan [BR05236524]
  4. Nazarbayev University [110119FD4504]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Improving sulfur redox kinetics and cycling stability of lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries through controlling inherent dissolution of polysulfides and following shuttle effect is pivotal for further progress of this promising electrochemical system. In this work, three-dimensional porous microspheres composed of nanosized sulfur particles, nitrogen-doped oxygen-deficient TiO2-x nanorods and reduced graphene oxide (N-TiO2-x/RGO/S) were synthesized as sulfur host material for the first time in spray-drying process. The microspheres construction with void spaces mitigated volumetric expansion upon charge/discharge cycling and improved sulfur utilization. Furthermore, the N-TiO2-x nanorods enhanced the conductivity of the material and exhibited strong capability for adsorption and the migration of lithium polysulfides, which was demonstrated by the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Due to such advantages, the N-TiO2-x/RGO/S cathode delivered excellent rate capability and stable cycle performance at 1.0 C over 300 cycles with a specific capacity about 700 mAh g(-1). This novel design and preparation strategy also contributes to the materials engineering and structural design towards remarkable improvement of electrochemical performance of energy storage systems. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据