4.6 Article

Interlaced nickel phosphide nanoflakes wrapped orthorhombic niobium pentoxide nanowires array for sustainable aqueous asymmetric supercapacitor

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 325, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134934

关键词

Orthorhombic Nb2O5; Nickel phosphide nanoflakes; Core-shell; Hierarchical nanostructure; Asymmetric supercapacitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21703173, 21664012, 51863019]
  2. program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT15R56]
  3. Basic Scientific Research Innovation Team Project of Gansu Province [1606RJIA324]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To obtain simple and cost-effective functional energy storage system at a practical level, a novel coreshell porous nanocomposite based on orthorhombic niobium pentoxide (T-Nb2O5) nanowires and metallic phosphides nanoflakes is reasonably designed and synthesized by a highly efficient solvothermal and subsequently moderate phosphorization procedure. The T-Nb2O5 nanowires act as structure-directing agent to directionally grow hierarchical ultrathin porous nickel phosphide (Ni2P) nanoflakes, thus providing high electrical conductivity, large surface area and sufficient redox active sites. Owing to the distinctive nanostructure and synergistic effects of the T-Nb2O5@Ni2P core-shell heterostructure, its electrochemical properties have vastly improved. When the current density is 1 A g(-1), a high specific capacity of 105 mAh g(-1) can be obtained. In addition, an asymmetric supercapacitor assembled based on the T-Nb2O5@Ni2P composite positive electrode and activated carbon negative electrode exhibits a high energy density of 30.2 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 453 W kg(-1 )and impressive cycling stability (90%) after 5000 cycles. The well-defined oxide/phosphide core-shell materials can be expected to a new type of electrode materials for the high-performance supercapacitors. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据