4.6 Article

One-pot sulfur-containing ion assisted microwave synthesis of reduced graphene oxide@nano-sulfur fibrous hybrids for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 325, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134920

关键词

Lithium-sulfur batteries; Microwave treatments; Reduced graphene oxide fibers (rGOFs); Nano-sulfur; Crumpled structures

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51505209, 51572118, 11674140, 51772138, U1832149, 61874166]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2017-173, lzujbky-2018-33]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carbon nanomaterials have been frequently used to physically inhibit the lithium polysulfide's shuttle in lithium-sulfur batteries, especially those crumpled structure of graphene. Here, a type of reduced graphene oxide fiber enwrapped nano-sulfur (rGOF@nano-S) hybrids were synthesized by a simple sulfurcontaining-ion assisted microwave (MW) synthesis method and then utilized as a sulfur host for lithium -sulfur batteries. The synergistic reactions of MW treatments and sulfur-containing-ion force on the precursor GO nanosheets (NSs) have induced a well-crumpled fibrous structure, and simultaneously uniformly wrapped the nano-S particles in them, which would make the resultant cathodes achieve improved electrochemical performances. The rGOF@nano-S hybrid cathodes showed a high reversible capacity (886 mA h g(-1) at 0.1 C rate), a high rate capability (remaining 61% at 2 C rate), and an excellent cycling stability (with a minimal decay rate of 0.04% per cycle over 800 cycles at 1 C), which are highly improved compared to those of the hybrids without MW treatments. In addition, the optimal MW treatment time on rGOF@nano-S hybrid cathodes were also explored to be 2.4 min under 700-W power. This work suggests that MW treatments would be a useful strategy for the preparation of high-performance cathodes for Li-S batteries. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据