4.6 Article

Green low-temperature-solution-processed in situ HI modified TiO2/SnO2 bilayer for efficient and stable planar perovskite solar cells build at ambient air conditions

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 326, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134924

关键词

TiO2/SnO2; Electron transfer layer; Ambient condition; Perovskite solar cell

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51779065, 51579057]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology [2019DX11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Planar structures for halide perovskite solar cells with the high efficiencies typically use high-temperature processed TiO2 as the electron transporting layers (ETLs). Here, we demonstrate that an in-situ passivation strategy for TiO2 film through the introduction of HI during low-temperature preparation process. HI not only controls hydrolysis of TiO2 precursor but also eliminates defects and suppresses trap states in TiO2 film. Meanwhile, the double-layer architecture is constructed by coating TiO2 with SnO2 layer, the double ETLs can improve the photovoltaic performance of methylamine lead iodide (MAPbI(3)) perovskite solar cells. The TiO2(HI)/SnO2 ETL can effectively reduce the interfacial charge recombination and facilitate electron transfer. More importantly, the preparation of TiO2 and SnO2 are totally performed at low-temperature (150 degrees C) and the devices are fabricated in uncontrolled ambient conditions. Our best-performing planar perovskite cell using such a TiO2(HI)/SnO2 ETL has achieved a maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 16.74%, and the devices exhibit good stability which maintaining 85% and 83% of their initial efficiency after heating at 100 degrees C for 22 h and under illuminating upon 1 sun irradiation for 6 h, respectively. Our results suggest a new approach for further improving the stability of PSCs fabricated in the air condition. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据