4.5 Article

Mitigation of Cd toxicity by Mn in young plants of cacao, evaluated by the proteomic profiles of leaves and roots

期刊

ECOTOXICOLOGY
卷 29, 期 3, 页码 340-358

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-020-02178-4

关键词

Heavy metal; Processes involved; Proteomic profile; Repressed; Theobroma cacao; Western blot

资金

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia-FAPESB [SCA 58-1245-3-237F, SCA 58-8042-8-014F]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cd is a non-essential metal and highly toxic to plants, animals and humans, even at very low concentrations. Cd has been found in cocoa beans and in their products, as in the case of chocolate. Mn plays an important role in photosynthetic and can interact with Cd and attenuate its toxic effects on plants. The objective of this work was to evaluate the mechanisms of Mn response in the mitigation of Cd toxicity in young plants of the CCN 51 cacao genotype submitted to 0.8 mmol Cd kg(-1), 1.6 mmol Mn kg(-1) or the combination of 0.4 mmol Cd kg(-1) + 0.8 mmol Mn kg(-1) soil, together with the control treatment (without addition of Cd and Mn in soil), by means of analysis of changes in the profile of exclusive proteins (EP) and differentially accumulated proteins (DAP). Leaf and root proteins were extracted and quantified from the different treatments, followed by proteomic analysis. About eight DAP and 38 EP were identified in leaves, whereas in roots 43 DAP and 21 EP were identified. Some important proteins induced in the presence of Cd and repressed in the presence of Cd + Mn or vice versa, were ATPases, isoflavone reductase, proteasome and chaperonin. It was concluded that proteins involved in oxidoreduction and defense and stress response processes, in addition to other processes, were induced in the presence of Cd and repressed in the presence of Cd + Mn. This demonstrated that Mn was able to mitigate the toxic effects of Cd on young plants of the CCN 51 cocoa genotype.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据