4.7 Review

Carbonate budgets as indicators of functional reef health: A critical review of data underpinning census-based methods and current knowledge gaps

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105857

关键词

Calcium carbonate budget; Reef budget state; Community calcification; Reef growth; Reef accretion

资金

  1. Bertarelli Foundation as part of the Bertarelli Programme in Marine Sciences
  2. Royal Society - Newton Advanced Research Fellowship [NA-150360]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The carbonate budget of a reef describes the net rate of carbonate production resulting from various biologically-, physically- and chemically-driven production and erosion processes. Thus, budget state metrics can provide important information on a reef's growth potential and on the capacity of reefs to sustain key geo-ecological services such as habitat provision and coastal protection. Whilst various approaches for estimating carbonate budgets exist, census-based methods have gained recent interest because they quantify the contribution of different functional groups and taxa, and allow assessments of the links between changing reef ecology and budget states. However, the present paucity of supporting data on growth and erosion rates for the majority of coral species and reef-associated taxa represents a constraint on these budget estimates and limits meaningful between-site comparisons. In light of the growing interest in using carbonate budgets as a functional reef health assessment tool, this review thus considers our current state of knowledge regarding the geographic coverage of existing reef budget states and the availability of relevant supporting data. We use this to highlight current knowledge gaps, future challenges, and opportunities that emerging techniques may offer. The primary aim of this review is to encourage increased research efforts on budget states and underlying metrics in order to better constrain reef carbonate budget estimates from across a broad range of sites and environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据