4.7 Article

Vegetation dynamics and their relationships with climatic factors in the Qinling Mountains of China

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 108, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105719

关键词

Qinling Mountains; NDVI; Hurst exponent; Change-point; Hysteresis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundations of China [51979219]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0402404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The China Core of China's ecosystem, the Qinling Mountains (QM), occupies a special geographical location and has a unique ecosystem. Recently, the growth of vegetation has become an important indicator, reflecting the changes of the ecosystem. The characteristics of spatio-temporal variation of the vegetation and their relationships with climatic factors in the QM were analyzed using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), based on statistical analysis and Hurst exponent analysis. The results showed that NDVI generally increased over the past 16 years, with increasing NDVI occupying 96.29% of the total study area. The marginal areas of the northern QM were the major regions showing decreasing vegetation growth, while the largest increase in vegetation growth occurred in the northwest. Changes in topographical elements (slope, elevation) had marked impact on vegetation growth, with degraded vegetation being mainly distributed on slopes < 30 degrees and at an elevation < 1000 m. In the growing season, the relationship between increased precipitation and increased NDVI became weak when average precipitation exceeded 80 mm, whereas the positive effects of average temperature on NDVI increased as the temperature rose. The change-point of NDVI mainly occurred in the southwestern margin and the central-eastern regions of the QM, especially in 2006, 2007 and 2008. This study provides useful information on the vegetation growth status in the QM, and has practical implications for government policy in the vegetated areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据