4.7 Article

Rarefaction of beta diversity

期刊

ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105606

关键词

Community turnover; Directional and non-directional accumulation curves; Effective number of plots; Spatial autocorrelation; Species richness

资金

  1. H2020 project TRuStEE -Training on Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Modelling project [721995]
  2. H2020 COST Action Optical synergies for spatiotemporal sensing of scalable ecophysiological traits (SENSECO) [CA17134]
  3. H2020 COST Action Citizen Science to promote creativity, scientific literacy, and innovation throughout Europe [CA15212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Beta diversity has long been used to summarize the amount of variation in species composition among a set of N sampling units. However, while classical beta diversity provides an estimate of multiple-site dissimilarity among all sampling units, it is not informative on the changes of multiple-site dissimilarity as a function of sampling effort. For gamma diversity, this pattern is usually represented as a species accumulation curve, which is the graph of the number of observed species when the number of plots varies from 1 to N. Here, we will show that species accumulation curves may also be used to summarize directional and non-directional beta diversity as a function of sampling effort. The behavior of the proposed measures of beta diversity is illustrated with one worked example on plant species in Mediterranean coastal vegetation. We believe this approach to the measurement of beta diversity provides a relevant contribution to summarize multiple-site dissimilarity as the result of a species turnover process, rather than as a static indicator. For directional species accumulation curves, the method, for which we provide a custom R function, further allows summarizing the spatial autocorrelation in species composition among plots along an a-priori defined spatial, temporal or environmental gradient.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据