4.4 Article

Increasing the efficacy of forest thinning for snow using high-resolution modeling: A proof of concept in the Lake Tahoe Basin, California, USA

期刊

ECOHYDROLOGY
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/eco.2203

关键词

forest management; forest restoration; forest thinning; hydrological modelling; Lake Tahoe Basin; snow; snow-forest interactions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Forest manipulation using forest thinning is one of the few means to manage water resources supplying downstream populations that are derived from snow-covered montane forests. The challenges of simulating processes at the tree scale have precluded generalizable recommendations for removing tree canopy to maximize snow water resources. Here, we apply the high-resolution Snow Physics and Lidar Mapping (SnowPALM) model to simulate snow mass and energy budgets at 1-m scale over a 1,200 by 1,200 m domain on the west shore of Lake Tahoe, Sierra Nevada, USA. The SnowPALM model verifies well against observations of snow depth and snow temperature in open and under canopy locations. This supported the application of SnowPALM under virtual thinning experiments, where all trees <5, <10, <15, and <20 m height were removed during a 3-year simulation. Increasing snowpack sublimation losses are smaller than reductions in canopy interception resulting in an overall increase in melt volume. Despite relatively modest melt volume increases of 4-8% across the entire domain, individual 30-m stands could have >30% melt volume increases. On average, a 0.5 decrease in lidar-derived leaf area resulted in an ~10.5% increase in melt volume, with shorter, denser 30-m forest stands having greater melt volume sensitivity. These dense forest stands, where forest thinning was most effective, were found in valley bottoms and north-facing slopes across the west shore region. This proof of concept supports large domain simulations using high-resolution models to inform landscape-scale restoration decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据