4.2 Article

First episode rapid early intervention for eating disorders (FREED): From research to routine clinical practice

期刊

EARLY INTERVENTION IN PSYCHIATRY
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 625-630

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eip.12941

关键词

early intervention; eating disorders; emerging adults; FREED

资金

  1. NHS Innovation Accelerator (NIA) Fellowship
  2. Shine and Scaling-Up Improvement awards from The Health Foundation in the United Kingdom [GIFTS 7294/CRM 1216]
  3. NIHR Senior Investigator Award
  4. The Health Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Eating disorders are serious psychiatric disorders with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Early intervention can improve treatment outcomes and reduce disruption to psychosocial development. However, early intervention is not well established in the eating disorder field. First episode rapid early intervention for eating disorders (FREED) was developed to address barriers to early, effective eating disorder treatment in emerging adults aged 16 to 25 years. Since 2014, FREED has progressed from a single-site research project to an evidence-based care approach in nine eating disorder services. This paper aims to summarize key learning from the scaling of FREED to date, with attention to how this learning may generalizes to other models of care. Methods We describe the development, scaling and implementation of FREED with reference to the RE-AIM (reach; effectiveness/efficacy; adoption; implementation; maintenance) framework. We also summarize challenges and learning in each of the RE-AIM domains. Results FREED has demonstrated real-world validity across diverse clinical contexts, geographical regions and populations. Key outcomes are seen for each of the RE-AIM domains. Conclusions FREED provides an example of effective, non-commercial scaling of an early intervention eating disorder care pathway. This work is likely to be particularly relevant to others looking to scale-up early intervention models and for those working in secondary and tertiary mental health settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据