4.7 Article

Design and prediction of dye dispersibility stabilized by polymeric dispersants using a Dye-Monomer interaction force measurement

期刊

DYES AND PIGMENTS
卷 172, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107791

关键词

Force microscopy; Polymeric dispersant; Disperse dye; Dispersibility

资金

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Republic of Korea [10078335, 20000628]
  2. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [10078335, 20000628] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we propose a dye-monomer interaction force measurement technique based on atomic force microscopy (AFM) to predict the performance of polymeric dispersants. Cantilevers modified with functional monomers such as styrene, N-butyl acrylate (BA), and 2-(N-phthalimido)ethyl methacrylate (PEMA) were used to characterize the interaction force between these functional monomers and a target dye (Disperse Blue 359). The interaction forces of each monomer-styrene, BA, and PEMA-with Disperse Blue 359 were measured as 10.75 nN, 7.06 nN, and 21.31 nN, respectively, and their trend was consistent with dipole-moment values obtained from density function theory (DFT) calculations (p(styrene) = 0.0001, mu(PEMA) = 2.3158, mu(Disperse Blue 359) = 3.0368). We synthesized a series of model polymers containing specific functional monomers (CoPS10, CoBA, CoPPEMAs) with similar molecular weights, molecular-weight distributions, and acid contents and compared their actual performance with that predicted from interaction force measurement data. The results were well correlated with the interaction force measurement data. The effect of the PEMA content on dye dispersion stability was also investigated; the results indicated that both the PEMA content and the type of dye-interacting group greatly influenced the characteristics of the dispersion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据