4.4 Article

Impact of transition to an individualised funding model on allied health support of participation opportunities

期刊

DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION
卷 43, 期 21, 页码 3021-3030

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1725157

关键词

NDIS; Australia; disability; allied health; participation; ICF

资金

  1. Department of Industry and Skills, South Australia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research explored the impact of the National Disability Insurance Scheme on participation opportunities for people with disability in Australia. Stakeholder accounts revealed changes that could potentially eliminate participation barriers. Some participants viewed changes as obstructing equitable and quality professional practice, and the study highlighted potential opportunities to address these tensions.
Introduction: The National Disability Insurance Scheme is the new consumer-controlled funding system for people with disability in Australia, and is expected to enhance participation outcomes of people with disability. This research explored participation opportunities for people with disability during the formative period of transition to the scheme, through stakeholder accounts of changes in allied health service contexts. Materials and methods: Qualitative data were generated during interviews, workshops and meetings with industry, policy, practice and education stakeholders involved in scheme services. Inductive coding explored key themes within the data. The International Classification of Functioning model was then applied as a deductive coding framework to illuminate how the scheme was perceived to be impacting participation opportunities for recipients of scheme funding. Results and discussion: Using the International Classification of Functioning helped us illuminate whether changes resulting from scheme transition posed participation opportunities or barriers for scheme recipients. Research participants often framed these changes negatively, even when examples suggested that changes had removed participation barriers for scheme recipients. Some participants viewed changes as obstructing equitable and quality professional practice. We explore potential opportunities to resolve tensions that also optimise the participation outcomes of individuals who receive services through individualised funding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据