4.4 Article

Helicobacter pylori Eradication Regressed Gastric Hyperplastic Polyp: A Randomized Controlled Trial

期刊

DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES
卷 65, 期 12, 页码 3652-3659

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06065-0

关键词

Gastric polyp; Helicobacter pylori; Eradication; Regression

资金

  1. Korean Colleague of Helicobacter and Upper Gastrointestinal Research of Medical Sciences (IR) [2016] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Helicobacter pylori infection and hyperplastic polyp are known to have strong connections, but there are not enough randomized controlled trial data. Aims To evaluate the effect of H. pylori eradication on gastric hyperplastic polyp. Method This is an open-labeled, single-center, randomized controlled trial. Patients with hyperplastic polyp and current infection of H. pylori were randomly assigned to eradication or non-eradication groups. All participants underwent follow-up endoscopy to investigate the regression of gastric polyps. Gastric polyp regression was defined as the disappearance of polyps or a reduction of more than 50% in size. Results Thirty-two patients were randomized to eradication (n = 17) and non-eradication groups (n = 15). Final included patients were 14 in eradication group and 13 in non-eradication group. All patients showed polyp regression in eradication group, whereas no regression was observed in non-eradication group (P < 0.001). Disappearance of polyp (n = 7) and decrease in size (n = 7) were observed in eradication group. In non-eradication group, no change (n = 5), increase of size (n = 5), and increase of number (n = 3) were observed. Mean regression time was 6.8 months, and disappearance time was 9.8 months. In non-eradication group, hyperglycemia was noted in 50% of progression group but not noted in no change group (P = 0.057). Conclusions H. pylori eradication induced regression of hyperplastic polyp, and persistent H. pylori infection was related to progression of gastric polyp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据