4.6 Article

Expression of Aquaporin 1 and Aquaporin 4 in the Temporal Neocortex of Patients with Parkinson's Disease

期刊

BRAIN PATHOLOGY
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 160-168

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bpa.12369

关键词

astrocyte; alpha-synuclein; immunohistochemistry; pathology; water channel protein

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [26461314]
  2. Brain Research Institute, University of Niigata [2224]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461314] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The astrocytic water channel proteins aquaporin 1 (AQP1) and aquaporin 4 (AQP4) are known to be altered in brains affected by several neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease. However, AQP expression in brains affected by Parkinson's disease (PD) has not been described in detail. Recently, it has been reported that alpha-synuclein (alpha-syn)-immunolabeled astrocytes show preferential distribution in several cerebral regions, including the neocortex, in patients with PD. Here, we investigated whether AQP expression is associated with alpha-syn deposition in the temporal neocortex of PD patients. In accordance with the consensus criteria for dementia with Lewy bodies, the patients were classified into neocortical (PDneo), limbic (PDlim), and brain stem (PDbs) groups. Expressions of alpha-syn, AQP1, and AQP4 in the temporal lobes of the individual PD patients were examined immunohistochemically. Immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated more numerous AQP4-positive and AQP1-positive astrocytes in the PDneo group than in the PDbs, PDlim, and control groups. However, in the PDneo cases, these astrocytes were not often observed in alpha-syn-rich areas, and semiquantitative analysis revealed that there was a significant negative correlation between the levels of AQP4 and alpha-syn in layers V-VI, and between those of AQP1 and alpha-syn in layers II-III. These findings suggest that a defined population of AQP4- and AQP1-expressing reactive astrocytes may modify alpha-syn deposition in the neocortex of patients with PD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据