4.4 Article

Prevalence and management of diabetic neuropathy in secondary care in Qatar

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3286

关键词

diabetic neuropathy; painful diabetic neuropathy; diabetic foot ulceration; type 2 diabetes mellitus

资金

  1. Pfizer Gulf FZ LLC [W1230787]
  2. Qatar National Research Fund [BMRP-5726113101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a Cinderella complication, particularly in the Middle East. A high prevalence of undiagnosed DN and those at risk of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU) is a major concern. We have determined the prevalence of DN and its risk factors, DFU, and those at risk of DFU in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in secondary care in Qatar. Materials and methods Adults with T2DM were randomly selected from the two National Diabetes Centers in Qatar. DN was defined by the presence of neuropathic symptoms and a vibration perception threshold (VPT) >= 15 V. Participants with a VPT >= 25 V were categorized as high risk for DFU. Painful DN was defined by a DN4 score >= 4. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of DN. Results In 1082 adults with T2DM (age 54 +/- 11 years, duration of diabetes 10.0 +/- 7.7 years, 60.6% males), the prevalence of DN was 23.0% (95% CI, 20.5%-25.5%) of whom 33.7% (95% CI, 27.9%-39.6%) were at high risk of DFU, and 6.3% had DFU; 82.0% of the patients with DN were previously undiagnosed. The prevalence of DN increased with age and duration of diabetes and was associated with poor glycaemic control (HbA(1c) >= 9%) AOR = 2.1 (95% CI, 1.3-3.2), hyperlipidaemia AOR = 2.7 (95% CI, 1.5-5.0), and hypertension AOR = 2.0 (95% CI, 1.2-3.4). Conclusions Despite DN affecting 23% of adults with T2DM, 82% had not been previously diagnosed with one-third at high risk for DFU. This argues for annual screening and identification of patients with DN. Furthermore, we identify hyperglycaemia, hyperlipidaemia, and hypertension as predictors of DN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据