4.4 Review

Race and Ethnicity Gaps in Global Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Trials

期刊

DERMATOLOGY
卷 237, 期 1, 页码 97-102

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000504911

关键词

Hidradenitis suppurativa; Race and ethnicity; Clinical trials

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for Hidradenitis Suppurativa (HS) found that the majority of participants were Caucasian and of African descent, while Hispanic, Asian, American Indian, and Native Hawaiian participants were underrepresented. No trials included sub-analysis of treatment efficacy based on race or ethnicity.
Background: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is an often-debilitating disease characterized by chronic and recurrent painful nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts affecting the intertriginous areas. Despite evidence in the literature of varying prevalence of HS among different racial and ethnic groups, no studies have evaluated the overall generalizability of clinical trial results considering the increased prevalence of HS among African American populations. Additionally, there is a paucity of data exploring the distribution of race and ethnicity in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for HS. The goal of this analysis is to explore the distribution of race and ethnicity in recent HS RCTs. Summary: Using ClinicalTrials.gov and PubMed, race and ethnicity demographics were extracted from phase II and III trials published from 2000 to August 2019. Fifteen trials were included and among these trials 669 (68.0%) participants were Caucasian and 138 (14.0%) were of African descent. Asians, American Indian or Alaskan Natives, and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islanders comprised 29 (2.9%), 3 (0.3%), and 1 (0.1%) participant respectively. Only 15 participants were reported as Hispanic as only three trials reported ethnicity data. The remaining 144 (14.6%) participants were recorded as other/unspecified (36 self-identified, 108 lacked race reporting). None of the trials included sub-analysis of treatment efficacy based on race or ethnicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据