4.1 Article

Enhancement of sialylation in rIgG in glyco-engineered Chinese hamster ovary cells

期刊

CYTOTECHNOLOGY
卷 72, 期 3, 页码 343-355

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10616-020-00381-z

关键词

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell; IgG; Antibody; Glycosylation; Sialyltransferase; UDP-GlcNAc 2-epimerase; ManNAc kinase

资金

  1. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since about 70% of commercial biopharmaceutical products have been produced in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, this cell line is undeniably a workhorse for biopharmaceuticals production. Meanwhile, sialic acid terminals were reported to affect anti-inflammatory activity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity efficacy of IgG antibodies. Taking these findings together, we aimed to establish CHO cell lines that highly produce sialic acid terminals by overexpressing two N-acetylneuraminic acid-based key enzymes, alpha(2,6)-sialyltransferase and UDP-N-acetylglucosamine 2-epimerase/N-acetylmannosamine kinase using dihydrofolate reductase/methotrexate gene amplification method. Indeed, the number of total sialic acid terminal glycan structures increased tremendously, by 12-fold compared to the wild type in total protein extracts. With the methotrexate supplementation, a targeted cell line, CHOmt17-100, showed up to 1.4 times more sialylated structures of glycoforms in total proteins. Interestingly, immunoglobulin G, used as the model protein in CHOmt17-100, showed about 53% sialylated structures in its glycoforms. These resultant sialylated glycans exhibited more than approximately 14.5 times increase as compared to that of the wild type. Moreover, the resultant glycan structures mostly had N-acetylneuraminic acid terminals, while N-glycolylneuraminic acid terminal composition remained less than 5% as compared to the wild type. Engineered antibodies derived from CHO cell lines that produce high levels of sialic acid will contribute to the examination of glycoforms' efficacy and usefulness toward bio-better products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据