4.5 Article

Fetal cytokine response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus-2 infection

期刊

CYTOKINE
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cyto.2019.154883

关键词

PRRSV; Fetus; Porcine; Host-virus interaction; Resilience; Interferon; Cell cycle

资金

  1. Genome Prairie/Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture [346143]
  2. Genome Canada [345169]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To understand the fetal immune response to porcine reproductive and respiratory virus-2 (PRRSV) and to evaluate the association with fetal viability, pregnant gilts were challenged on gestation day 85 and euthanized 21 days post infection. Based on preservation status and viral load in serum and thymus, fetuses were classified as either uninfected-viable (UNIF), high viral load viable (HV-VIA), or high viral load meconium stained (HV-MEC) and were compared with age matched control (CON) fetuses derived from mock infected gilts. Gene expression of IFNB, IFNG, CCL2, CCL5, CXCL10 and IL10, were all found to be significantly upregulated in the thymus and spleen of both high viral load groups. UNIF fetuses remained largely unaffected, with only small upregulations in IFNA and IL10 in the thymus, and IFNA, CCL5 and CXCL10 in the spleen. Regarding fetal viability, expression of CCL5 was significantly elevated in the thymus and spleen of HV-MEC compared to HV-VIA fetuses. The concentrations of IFN alpha, IFN gamma, TNF alpha and CCL2 were elevated in the sera of all infected fetuses, whereas IFN beta was below the detection limit in all fetal sera. Additional gene expression analysis in the thymus showed significant downregulation of CDK1, CDK2 and CDK4, and upregulation of the inhibitor CDKNIA, suggesting altered regulation of cell cycle progression. Collectively, these results show near complete compartmentalization of the fetal immune response to infected fetuses and suggest this immune response is not a major contributor to fetal death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据