4.4 Review

Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: Looking Back, Looking Forward

期刊

CURRENT TOPICS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 32, 页码 2959-2969

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1568026620666200226104652

关键词

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT); Combination therapy; Neuroendocrine tumors (NET); Radiopharmaceuticals; Radiobiology; Therapeutic effects

资金

  1. Daniel den Hoed Foundation, Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a highly effective anti-cancer treatment modality for patients with non-resectable, metastasized neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). During PRRT, specific receptors that are overexpressed on the cancer cells are targeted with a peptide labeled with a DNA-damaging radionuclide. Even though PRRT is a powerful treatment for metastasized NET patients, the majority still cannot be cured at this stage of the disease. Hence, many investigators focus on improving the therapeutic efficacy of this therapy. Improving PRRT can, for example, be achieved by using other radionuclides with different physical properties, by combining PRRT with radiosensitizing agents or by radiolabeling peptides with different characteristics. However, due to lack of extensive knowledge of radiobiological responses of cancer cells to PRRT, biological parameters that influence absorbed dose or that might even elicit insensitivity to therapy remain elusive and the context in which these improvements will be successful warrants further investigation. In this review, we will discuss the development of PRRT, its clinical merits in current treamlent and future perspectives. We will highlight different radionuclides and their benefits and pitfalls, as well as different peptide-conjugates that hold these radionuclides. We will zoom in on the latest developments regarding combinatorial treatments and how investigators from different disciplines such as dosimetry and radiobiology are now joining forces to improve PRRT for NETs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据