4.2 Review

MRI Radiomics Classification and Prediction in Alzheimer's Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Review

期刊

CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 297-309

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1567205017666200303105016

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; mild cognitive impairment; MR imaging; radiomics; texture analysis; classification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871337]
  2. Science Foundation from the Health Commission of Zhejiang Province [2020369796]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that threatens the health of the elderly. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is considered to be the prodromal stage of AD. To date, AD or MCI diagnosis is established after irreversible brain structure alterations. Therefore, the development of new biomarkers is crucial to the early detection and treatment of this disease. At present, there exist some research studies showing that radiomics analysis can be a good diagnosis and classification method in AD and MCI. Objective: An extensive review of the literature was carried out to explore the application of radiomics analysis in the diagnosis and classification among AD patients, MCI patients, and Normal Controls (NCs). Results: Thirty completed MRI radiomics studies were finally selected for inclusion. The process of radiomics analysis usually includes the acquisition of image data, Region of Interest (ROI) segmentation, feature extracting, feature selection, and classification or prediction. From those radiomics methods, texture analysis occupied a large part. In addition, the extracted features include histogram, shape-based features, texture-based features, wavelet features, Gray Level Co-Occurrence Matrix (GLCM), and Run-Length Matrix (RLM). Conclusion: Although radiomics analysis is already applied to AD and MCI diagnosis and classification, there still is a long way to go from these computer-aided diagnostic methods to the clinical application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据