4.7 Article

A comprehensive study of fracture evolution of brittle rock containing an inverted U-shaped cavity under uniaxial compression

期刊

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103219

关键词

Fracture evolution; Digital image correlation; Acoustic emission; Complex variable theory; Stress distribution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [51774321]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China, China [2018YFC0604606]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China of Central South University [2018zzts215]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to investigate the fracture evolution around an inverted U-shaped opening under compressive loads. Firstly, a series of uniaxial compression tests were conducted on sandstone specimens containing a cavity incorporating digital image correlation (DIC) and acoustic emission (AE) techniques. Next, the complex variable theory combined with an optimization algorithm was used to find the analytical stress solution for the inverted U-shaped cavity. The experimental results show that the shear dominated failure of the pre-holed specimen is a progressive process of primary tensile cracks - secondary tensile cracks and slabbing fractures - shear cracks. The DIC results are consistent with the variation of AE signals, The crack closure stress, crack initiation stress and crack damage stress of the specimen containing an inverted U-shaped cavity are about 24%, 30% and 90% of the peak stress, respectively. Theoretical analysis indicates that the cavity shape and lateral stress ratio are prominent factors affecting the stress distribution. Based on the stress distribution around the inverted U-shaped cavity under uniaxial stress, the fracture evolution mechanisms are well revealed. Moreover, the propagation behavior of the primary tensile cracks is discussed in detail, and a method for determining the crack length is also proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据