4.7 Article

Epoxy resin composites reinforced and fire-retarded by surficially-treated carbon fibers via a tunable and facile process

期刊

COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 187, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2019.107945

关键词

Carbon fiber; Composites; Epoxy resin; Polyelectrolyte complexes; Fire retardance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51761135132, 51721091]
  2. Sichuan Province Youth Science and Technology Innovation Team [2017TD0006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Construction of carbon fiber (CF)-reinforced epoxy resin (EP) composites with excellent mechanical properties and desired flame retardancy is of particular interests for both academia and industry. In this work, an interfacial treatment strategy is used to address the above issues instead of adding flame retardants into the composites: without additional other flame retardants, EP is fire-retarded and reinforced only by surficially-treated CFs, which are fabricated by quickly soaking CFs in aqueous solution of polyelectrolyte complexes (PEC) consisting of polyethyleneimine (PEI) and ammonium polyphosphate (APP) at room temperature. Both the content and the morphology of the resulting PEC coating are conveniently tuned by adjusting the coating conditions. Without any change in the molding process of the EP/CF composites compared with the conventional process, the phosphorus-containing PEC coating of CF surfaces endows the EP/CF composites with high fire retardancy, exhibiting a high limiting oxygen index of 43%, UL-94 V-0 rating, and a 47% reduction in the peak heat release rate (PHRR) from cone calorimetry tests. Moreover, the PEC coating greatly improved the interaction between CFs and EP matrix, and enhanced the mechanical properties and glass transition temperature of the composite. Therefore, this work presents an effective and facile strategy to develop fiber-reinforced composites with superior fire-retardant and mechanical properties for future massive production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据