4.7 Article

Synthesis and characterization of poly(styrene-block-acrylic acid) diblock copolymer modified magnetite nanocomposite for efficient removal of penicillin G

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107643

关键词

Penicillin G; Poly(styrene-block-acrylic acid) diblock copolymer; Adsorption; Magnetic nanocomposite; Response surface methodology

资金

  1. University of Zabol [UOZ-GR-9618-40]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A versatile synthesis of pH-responsive poly(styrene-block-acrylic acid) (poly(St-b-AA)) diblock copolymer modified Fe3O4 magnetite nanocomposite (poly(St-b-AA)@Fe3O4) was performed for pharmaceutical removal application. For this purpose, the diblock copolymer poly(St-b-AA) was synthesized via reversible addition of fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization technique. This synthesized copolymer with -COOH groups were adsorbed onto the surface of Fe3O4 to produce poly(St-b-AA)@Fe3O4 nanocomposite, which was then used as adsorbent to remove penicillin G. The synthesis of polystyrene homopolymer poly(St) (macro-RAFT agent) and poly(St-b-AA) diblock copolymer was confirmed by fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and H-1 nuclear magnetic resonance ((HNMR)-H-1). The poly(St-b-AA)@Fe3O4 nanocomposite was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry analysis (TGA), FTIR and dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis. After that the poly(St-b-AA)@Fe3O4 was applied to remove penicillin G (an antibiotic) from aqueous solution. The findings indicate that the optimal conditions for maximum penicillin G removal were pH 11, initial penicillin concentration 50 mg/L, poly(St-b-AA)@Fe3O4 dose 0.5 g/L and contact time 50 min. Under such conditions, the extent of penicillin G removal was 99.99%. Based on the obtained results, it is found that the poly(St-b-AA)@Fe3O4 adsorbent can be used as an effective adsorbent for removing penicillin G from aqueous solutions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据